IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ABHILASH – Appellant
Versus
KALAMASSERY MUNICIPALITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's grievance regarding municipal actions. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's direction for staying municipal work until petitions considered. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:
" A) A writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions, directing the honourable ombudsman for Local self government institutions will take up and dispose off Exhibit P8 review petition and Exhibit P9 urgent petition forthwith within a time limit fixed by this court after hearing the petitioner and hi advocate and after considering all documents placed on record by them B) A writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to stop all proceedings to o concrete the alleged public pathway revealed as per item 39, 40 and 43 of Exhibit P10 reply issued under the Right to Information Act till the Honourable Ombudsman hears and disposed off Exhibit P8 review petition."
[SIC]
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner submitted Ext.P8 review petition before the ombudsman, Local Self Government Institutions (LSGI). The post of Ombudsman is now vacant. The Municipality is now proceeding with the concrete work for the d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.