Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
SHYJU CHACKO – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges the rejection of noc application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding site suitability and objections. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court evaluates importance of local objections and safety concerns. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court allows the petition and orders issuance of noc. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging Ext.P17 Order rejecting the Application for No Objection Certificate under Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules , 2002, of the Respondent No.4 for establishing a Petroleum Retail Outlet by the Petitioner as the Dealer of the Respondent No.4. Petitioner has obtained a Letter of Intent to start a Petroleum Retail Outlet from the Respondent No.4 on his land situated in Survey Nos.98/20 & 98/17 of Achuranam Village in Vythiri Taluk in Wayanad District. Respondent No.4 has obtained Ext.P4 PESO Clearance for the said Outlet.
2. Respondent Nos. 4, 5 & 6 have filed Counter Affidavit supporting the Petitioner. The Respondent No.2/District Collector has filed a Counter Affidavit opposing the prayers in the Writ Petition.
3. I heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Sri. Praveen K. Joy, learned Government Plea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
