Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
PREMNATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenged order under k.l.r. act. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments presented highlight previous court rulings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on requisition basis and ownership. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. final ruling allowing the writ petition. (Para 8) |
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 5th day of February, 2026 Petitioners are aggrieved by Ext.P5 Order issued by the District Collector under Section 120A of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 ('K.L.R. Act', for short), which prevented a proposed transaction of the petitioners in respect of the subject property in favour of a third party. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Senior Government Pleader. Perused the records.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the reasons which weighed with the learned Single Judges in Exts.P8 and P9 judgments, to frown upon similar orders passed under Section 120A of the K.L.R. Act, would squarely cover the instant Ext.P5 Order as well. Ext.P5 Order is in the teeth of Exts.P8 and P9 judgments, is the point argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners seek similar reliefs.
4. Learned Senior Government Pleader would submit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
