Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
JOSEPH ANDREWS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details on petitioner's disciplinary history (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 2. legal proceedings related to suspensions (Para 4 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 17) |
| 3. arguments regarding petitioner's misconduct (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. court's analysis on procedural fairness (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. court's direction for regularization and pension processing (Para 32) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition, aggrieved by the non-regularisation of his suspension period. The petitioner seeks a direction to quash Ext.P14 and Ext.P15 orders and further prays that the period from 18.02.2015 to 07.03.2016 be treated as duty, with a consequential re-fixation of salary. Additionally, the petitioner seeks promotion to the post of Higher Secondary School Teacher (for short ‘HSST’) from the appropriate notional date, along with the disbursement of all attendant monetary and service benefits.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he was originally appointed as an HSA (Maths) under the 6th respondent on 15.07.1996. On 11.11.2008, the petitioner attended the District Maths Festival and obtained a duty certificate issued by the District Educational Officer (DE
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
