IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
SUDHIR B. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for organ transplantation (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding lack of reasoning in decision (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. direction for reassessment with evidence (Para 4) |
J U D G M E N T
This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to quash Ext.P14 order passed by the third respondent, the District Level Authorisation Committee for transplantation of Human Organs, Alappuzha. The first petitioner is the patient and the second petitioner is the donor. Since the liver of the close relatives of the first petitioner is not suitable, the second petitioner informed her willingness to donate liver to the first petitioner. They have jointly filed Exts.P12 and P13 applications. The third respondent, after considering the applications, rejected the prayer for transplantation as per Ext.P14 order. Aggrieved by Ext.P14 order, the petitioners have approached this Court by filing the above writ petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there was no proper consideration of the application, while passing Ext.P14 order and sought for a remand of the matter. On a perusal of Ext.P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.