SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9407

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ANILKUMAR C – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 386 OF 2026|CRIME NO.1086/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.ARAVIND MENON
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP

The court granted bail based on the lack of evidence against the accused, emphasizing co-operation with ongoing investigations.

Headnote:This application, filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), seeks regular bail for the accused in Crime No.1086/2025, alleging intent to kill. The court analyzed the lack of material connecting the applicants to the crime. The court emphasized the need for co-operation in investigation and conditions for bail as outlined in the order. The applicants' bail application was allowed with specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. allegations against the accused regarding intent to kill and associated injuries. (Para 2)
2. arguments presented by the counsel regarding innocence and implications. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's observations on the need for bail and cooperation during investigation. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS )

seeking regular bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos. 1 to 3 in Crime No.1086/2025 of Ottapalam Police Station, Palakkad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 126(2), 118(1), 118(2) and 109(1) r/w Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 20.12.2025 at 19.45 hours, due to previous animosity towards the complainant, accused 1 to 4, in furtherance of their common intention to kill the complainant, wrongfully restrained the scooter of the complainant and beat on the head of the complainant with an iron pipe. The complainant restrained the attack by hand. Accused Nos. 1 to 4 beat the complainant, and a bone on the left hand of the complainant was broken, and he sustained severe injuries. Thus, the accused are alleged to have committed the offences alleged.

4. I have heard Sri.K.Aravind Menon, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and they are not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicants were remanded to judicial custody on 23.12.2025. The investigation is almost over. The recovery has been effected. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicants is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicants shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE

mea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top