SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9411

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
RABATH T M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 653 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.GOKUL K.S., SHRI.ROHIT NAIR, SHRI.NITHIN SATHEESH
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Court granted pre-arrest bail, noting insufficient evidence for charges against the applicant.

Headnote:This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for pre-arrest bail. The accused is implicated in Crime No. 1039/2025, with allegations involving violent acts against the defacto complainant. The prosecution argues intentional criminal acts by the accused. The court finds no overt act alleged against the applicant and grants pre-arrest bail due to lack of sufficient evidence connecting the applicant to the crime. The application is allowed subject to conditions including cooperation with the investigation and non-contact with witnesses.

Table of Content
1. overview of the incident and accusations against the applicant. (Para 2)
2. discussion on applicant's innocence and lack of evidence. (Para 4 , 5)
3. conditions under which bail is granted. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed underSection 482of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023(for short, BNSS ), seeking pre- arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.1039/2025 of Medical College Police Station, Kozhikode District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2) and 118(1) read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 25.12.2025, while the defacto complainant and his friend Jibish were returning home after a meeting at Thali, Kozhikode, a car with registration number KL 11 BL 7955, driven by the accused No.1, hit the rear of the motorcycle the defacto complainant was riding near Puthiyara. The defacto complainant continued the journey without pursuing the matter; however, the accused persons intercepted them at Pottammal Junction. The accused, who was driving the car, stabbed the defacto complainant's friend in the face with a key, kicked the defacto complainant, stabbed the right side of the defacto complainant's head with a key, punched the defacto complainant in the face with a clenched fist. Both individuals sustained injuries in the incident and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Gokul K.S., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. I went through the FIS. No overt act has been alleged against the applicant. It was the accused No.1 who assaulted the defacto complainant with a key. The allegation against the applicant is that he was present along with the accused No.1. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations made against the applicant, his custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. (vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top