Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHIFAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail filed under relevant statute. (Para 1) |
| 2. accusations involve possession of illegal substances. (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments highlight innocence and lack of evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. bail granted with specific compliance conditions. (Para 6) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.28/2026 of Mulavukad Police Station, Ernakulam District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 22 (b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 .
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 12.01.2026 at about 11.45 hours, the applicant was found in possession of 0.67 grams of MDMA at the Ro-Ro Jetty premises, Vypin. It is alleged that on inspection, the substance appeared to be MDMA.
4. I have heard Adv.M.B. Shyni, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C. Ashi, the learned Public Prosecutor.
Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
