Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SUGILA K, VINOD K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application filed under the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, detailing allegations of misappropriation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecution asserts petitioners are not cooperating; petitioners claim they were falsely implicated. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. the court applies principles of bail to determine continued detention is unnecessary. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. cites previous court rulings on the presumption of innocence and necessity for bail. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. the bail application is granted with conditions for the petitioners. (Para 12) |
ORDER
The application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , by the accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No. 1050/2025 registered by the Kannur Town Police Station, Kannur, alleging the commission of offences punishable under Sections 316 (2), 318(4) and 316(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 . The petitioners were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.01.2026.
2. The prosecution case, in a nutshell, is that:
The first petitioner was appointed as a Chief Executive Officer of a group of business establishments named “Sheri or Sherry brand," which is owned by the second respondent (defacto complaina
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
