J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, who was appointed as LPST (Lower Primary School Teacher) in the school managed by the 4^th respondent herein w.e.f. 01.06.2017, was required to be shifted to a retirement vacancy in the year 2019 since the original appointment was against an additional post. The subsequent appointment against the regular vacancy was w.e.f. 06.06.2019. There is no dispute with reference to the petitioner's service from 06.06.2019 onwards. However, the petitioner sought for notional benefits from 01.06.2017 till such time she was appointed to the regular vacancy as noticed above, with reference to the mandate under the G.O.(P)No.4/2021 dated 06.02.2021. Originally the petitioner's appointment in the additional post was also resubmitted by the manager for approval, and that was also approved by the Assistant Educational Officer (AEO). Later, it appears that steps are being taken for withdrawing the approval as above, as evidenced by the proceedings at Ext.P4 – audit objection, which is also seen confirmed by the Government at Ext.P10. It is seeking to challenge the afore that the petitioner is before this Court .

2. I have heard Smt. P.A. Jenzia, the learned counsel for t