Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
USHA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5164 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments on conditions required for pcc issuance. (Para 2) |
| 2. court mandates customized pcc with stipulations. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved as the 2ndrespondent has not considered her request for a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) favourably.
2. The learned DSGI appearing for respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner is involved in a criminal case and therefore, only a Customised PCC can be issued, and that too only on orders from this Court.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned DSGI appearing for the 2nd respondent and having perused Ext.P2 order of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal and Ext.P3 order of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court- IV, Attingal, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to issue a Customized PCC to the petitioner also mentioning the details of the case mentioned in Exts.P2 and P3 orders. The needful shall be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
