IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
USHA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved as the 2ndrespondent has not considered her request for a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) favourably.
2. The learned DSGI appearing for respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner is involved in a criminal case and therefore, only a Customised PCC can be issued, and that too only on orders from this Court.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned DSGI appearing for the 2nd respondent and having perused Ext.P2 order of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal and Ext.P3 order of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court- IV, Attingal, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2nd respondent to issue a Customized PCC to the petitioner also mentioning the details of the case mentioned in Exts.P2 and P3 orders. The needful shall be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.