Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
K. Ullas Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for elephant procession registration. (Para 2) |
| 2. hearing of counsel for both parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. acknowledgment of pending application. (Para 4) |
| 4. approval for procession with conditions. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers:
a) “Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the respondents 2 to 6 to register the temple of the petitioner under Kerala Captive Elephants (Management and Maintenance) Rules, 2012 , pursuant to application evidenced by Ext. P3, P9 and P10; b) To declare that the respondents 2 to 6 are duty bound to grant permission to petitioner to conduct the elephant procession in connection with the ensuing Shivarathri festival, as the petitioner had already applied for registration as is evident from Ext.P3, P9 and P10;
c) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the respondents 2 to 6 to grant permission to the petitioner to conduct elephant procession in the ensuing Shivarathri festival expeditiously;
d) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P8 expeditiou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
