IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHIYAS ISMAIL, AATHMAJ JOY, THANSEER MAKKAR V.M., JOYAL JOSE, IBRAHIMKUTTY ASHRAF, SAINUL ABIDEEN B, AJOBIN K JOMON, JOSHY MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
Dated this the 11thday of February, 2026The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 8 in C.C.No.288/2022 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Idukki, which has arisen from Crime No.312/2022 registered by the Kanjikuzhy Police Station, Idukki, alleging the commission of the offences punishable underSections 143, 144, 146, 147, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i) read withSection 149of theIndian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure-3 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The 2nd respondent has no subsisting grievance and does
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.