SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9449

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. SOUMEN SEN, CJ, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
VIGNESWARA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.RAKESH
For the Respondents: SRI.J.KRISHNAKUMAR, SRI.P.V.THOMAS, SHRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY, VINITHA B. -SR.GP

The counter affidavit filed by the respondents pursuant to the earlier order sets out the steps taken in response to the alleged violation of the conditions of the soil mining permission. Based on the reports obtained from the Village Officer, appropriate action has been initiated. The affidavit further discloses that a stop memo has already been issued, and the same is under challenge in W.P.(C) No. 2333 of 2026.

2. In view of the above, no further orders are called for in this petition. We are satisfied with the steps taken by the 7th respondent in this regard.

3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top