Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. SOUMEN SEN, CJ, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
VIGNESWARA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(PIL) NO. 42 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court confirms actions taken are satisfactory. (Para 1) |
| 2. no further orders necessary in the petition. (Para 2) |
The counter affidavit filed by the respondents pursuant to the earlier order sets out the steps taken in response to the alleged violation of the conditions of the soil mining permission. Based on the reports obtained from the Village Officer, appropriate action has been initiated. The affidavit further discloses that a stop memo has already been issued, and the same is under challenge in W.P.(C) No. 2333 of 2026.
2. In view of the above, no further orders are called for in this petition. We are satisfied with the steps taken by the 7th respondent in this regard.
3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
