SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9471

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN, J
PRAVEEN J – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 658 OF 2026|CRIME NO.1198/2025|CRMC NO.2895 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.LIJU. M.P
For the Respondents: SMT.SREEJA V., SR. PP

A petitioner may withdraw a bail application if a charge sheet has been filed.

Headnote:The court assesses a bail application under the pertinent legal framework. The petitioner contends that the charge sheet has been filed and chooses not to pursue the application. The court dismisses the bail application as non-pursued. The main issue addressed is the status of the charge sheet and the petitioner’s decision on the application. Ultimately, the bail application is dismissed due to the petitioner's indication of non-pursual.

O R D E R

After hearing the submission made by the learned Senior Public Prosecutor that the charge sheet has already been filed in this case, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing this bail application.

Taking note of the said submission, the bail application is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon