J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved by Exts.P5 and P6, through which an application filed seeking review of the award in O.P(MV) No.749 of 2006 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-I, Alappuzha, dated 22.08.2016, was dismissed, consequent to the dismissal of the application to set aside the delay in filing the review petition.

2. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal found no reason for condoning the delay of 852 days in filing the review petition.

3. Going through the orders impugned, I do not find any illegality in declining the review petitions, warranting interference in this original petition. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the award passed, the remedy lies in challenging the same by filing an appeal. Without prejudice to the said right, this original petition is dismissed.

SD/-