SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9482

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ANWAR. T.K. – Appellant
Versus
ASOKAN – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 758 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SANTHOSH KUMAR V.P., SRI.SAJEEVAN KURUKKUTTIYULLATHIL, SHRI.VISHNU PRABHAKAR V.S., SRI.CIBIN C.VARGHESE, SMT.M.P.SHERIN, SHRI.ASHWIN K.U., SMT.ADWAITHA UDAYAN, SHRI.RENJITH R., SHRI.JOHN PAUL PADIKKALA

A writ petition can be dismissed for default if the petitioner’s counsel reports no instructions.

Headnote:1. The case revolves around a Writ Petition, where the petitioner sought to contest a default dismissal. The petitioner was represented by multiple advocates. The court observed the lack of instruction via the petitioner's counsel and dismissed the petition for default. 2. The primary issue was whether the absence of instruction warranted dismissal. The court's ratio decidendi emphasized procedural adherence, stating, 'the writ petition is dismissed for default.' 3. The final outcome recorded was the dismissal of the writ petition.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel who was appearing for the petitioner reports no instruction. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE DMR/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top