ANWAR. T.K. vs ASOKAN - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9482

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9482

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ANWAR. T.K. – Appellant
Versus
ASOKAN – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SANTHOSH KUMAR V.P., SRI.SAJEEVAN KURUKKUTTIYULLATHIL, SHRI.VISHNU PRABHAKAR V.S., SRI.CIBIN C.VARGHESE, SMT.M.P.SHERIN, SHRI.ASHWIN K.U., SMT.ADWAITHA UDAYAN, SHRI.RENJITH R., SHRI.JOHN PAUL PADIKKALA

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel who was appearing for the petitioner reports no instruction. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE DMR/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9482

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JANWAR. T.K. – AppellantVersusASOKAN – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ANWAR. T.K. – Appellant
Versus
ASOKAN – Respondent