Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9485
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
KARTHIK BABU S. – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4618 OF 2026
Important Points
Subject
Administrative Law - Passport Law
Headnote
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SREERAJ M.D.
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA SMT. DEVI SHRI R., GP.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conditions for pcc due to criminal case. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's directive to issue a customized pcc. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved as the 1strespondent has not considered his request for a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) favourably.
2. The learned DSGI appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner is involved in a criminal case and therefore, only a Customised PCC can be issued, and that too only on orders from this Court.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned DSGI appearing for the 1st respondent and having perused Exts.P1 and P4, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to issue a Customized PCC to the petitioner also mentioning the details of the case mentioned in Ext. P1 order. The needful shall be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
