Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
V. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests to quash expense remittance. (Para 1) |
| 2. court requires expense assessment instructions. (Para 2) |
| 3. board report specifies required installation costs. (Para 3) |
| 4. petitioner advised to pursue statutory remedies. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers.
“i) Call for the records.
ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari to quash Exhibit P5 dated 19.10.2013, Exhibit P7 dated 29.11.2013 and Exhibit P9 dated 06.03.2014 is as much as the petitioner is directed to remit the entire Expenses for shifting the Service Wire through the alternative feasible route suggested by the petitioner and agreed by the Respondents.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order of direction to Respondents 1 to 4 to effect shifting of Service wire from the present alignment to the alternative feasible route suggested by the petitioner and agreed by the Respondents.
iv) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents 1 to 4 to dispense with the remittance of expenses by the petitioner for shifting the Electricity Service wire and direct the 5th Respondent or in the alternative KSEB to bea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
