Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
C.H.AMARANADH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disciplinary action under organizational rules (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the interpretation of internal rules (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. clarification on non-precedent nature of the ruling (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
P.V.BALAKRISHNAN,J This intra-court appeal is filed by respondents 1 to 7 in W.P.
(C)No.1734/2019, challenging the judgment dated 14.07.2025, allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent herein, in part.
2. The respondent herein/writ petitioner was working as a Senior Deputy General Manager(Production) in Cochin division of the Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'FACT,' for short). While so, he was visited with disciplinary proceedings leading to Ext.P6 order, imposing a penalty of censure. Even though the respondent herein challenged the same by filing an appeal, the same ended in dismissal. The disciplinary authority had found the respondent guilty of misconduct under Rule 17 of The Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Limited Employees' (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1977 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules' for short). It is challenging the disciplinary proceedings and the afore Rule, the responde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
