Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SURESH K – Appellant
Versus
1 INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICE,EXEMPTION WARD, AAYKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is an assessee under the provisions of the Income Tax Act . As against Exts.P1 to P5 assessment orders, the petitioner submitted Exts.P6 to P10 appeals before the First Appellate Authority. Along with the appeals, Exts.P11 to P15 stay petitions were also submitted. The grievance of the petitioner is against the execution proceedings that are being pursued pending consideration of the said applications.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents pointed out that, there is a small delay in filing the appeals and the said fact is already noted in the appeal itself.
In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2nd respondent to take up Exts.P11 to P15 and to take a decision thereon in accordance with law after giving the petitioner an opportunity for being heard, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time, all coercive proceedings based on Exts.P1 to P5 shall be kept in abeyance.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
