IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. SOUMEN SEN, CJ, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
MALAKANDY VIJAYAN – Appellant
Versus
POORNIMA NARAYANAN – Respondent
O R D E R
[RCRev. Nos.304/2025 and 305/2025]
Soumen Sen, C. J.
Heard Mr.Sidharth P Sasi, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and Mr.P.K. Ravisankar, the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner has fairly submitted that having regard to the findings of the both the courts, he may be given sometime, within which, he shall surrender the vacant possession of the premises in question.
3. These revision petitions disposed of by giving some time to the revision petitioner to vacate the premises.
4. The learned counsel for respondent/landlord submits that the revision petitioner has not paid occupational charges for five months. In the event, if the delivery of the possession is not effected on or before 15.04.2026, the execution proceedings shall revive and all dues that are payable shall be realised in the said execution proceedings. It is pertinent to mention that for the two months' time for which we permit the respondent to occupy the premises, the occupational charges, shall be paid on or before 15.04.2026.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.