SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9527

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
AHAMMED.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 759 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.63/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.RAKESH THAMBAN
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD, SR. PP

The absence of sufficient evidence against the accused warranted the granting of bail, balancing the rights of the individual against the interests of justice.

Headnote:The applicant seeks bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 following the alleged possession of 1.100 Kg of ganja, punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)

(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The court determined that the applicant, who has no prior criminal record, is entitled to bail as continued detention is not necessary. The key issues framed by the court include the sufficiency of evidence against the applicant. The court's reasoning centered around the lack of materials connecting the applicant to the crime and the conclusion that releasing him on bail would not jeopardize the investigation. The application is allowed with specified conditions regarding collaboration with the ongoing investigation and participation in court proceedings.

Table of Content
1. accused was found in possession of narcotics. (Para 2)
2. arguments presented for and against bail application. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court grants bail with specific conditions. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused in Crime No.63/2025 of Hosdurg Excise Range Office, Kasargod District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 20 (b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act , 1985.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 17.12.2025, the applicant was found in possession of 1.100 Kg of ganja and thereby committed the offence alleged.

4. I have heard Sri.P. Rakesh Thamban, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A. Noushad, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 17.12.2025. The investigation is almost over. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE

mea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top