Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHAMEEMA.K. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context of the application regarding fraud allegations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the necessity of bail. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's observation on the seriousness of the offence. (Para 7) |
ORDER
This application is filed underSection 482of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre- arrest bail.
2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.1220/2025 of Taliparamba Police Station, Kannur District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 318 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant, with the dishonest intention of cheating, made the defacto complainant believe that if a deposit was made in the jewellery business of the accused, she would get a high profit and, by using that profit, a house would be purchased for her, and accordingly received Rs. 2,00,000/- directly on 12.12.2024 and Rs. 7,00,000/- on 16.12.2024 through account transfer. The applicant has neither returned the money nor purchased a house for her. Thus, the applicant is alleged to have committed the offence alleged.
4. I have heard Sri.K.M. Jamaludheen, the learned counsel for the applicant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
