SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9533

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHAMEEMA.K. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 13379 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.1220/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN, SMT.LATHA PRABHAKARAN, SMT.ANJANA K.
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD, SR. PP

Pre-arrest bail is not a matter of course; it requires a special case that warrants the court's extraordinary jurisdiction, particularly if investigations are at a preliminary stage.

Headnote:Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 permits bail applications under special circumstances. The case involves pre-arrest bail for the accused in a serious offence under Section 318(4). Court found insufficient evidence for bail, noting the possibility of interference with investigations and a need for custodial interrogation. The application is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. context of the application regarding fraud allegations. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented regarding the necessity of bail. (Para 5)
3. court's observation on the seriousness of the offence. (Para 7)

ORDER

This application is filed underSection 482of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre- arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.1220/2025 of Taliparamba Police Station, Kannur District. The offence alleged is punishable under Section 318 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant, with the dishonest intention of cheating, made the defacto complainant believe that if a deposit was made in the jewellery business of the accused, she would get a high profit and, by using that profit, a house would be purchased for her, and accordingly received Rs. 2,00,000/- directly on 12.12.2024 and Rs. 7,00,000/- on 16.12.2024 through account transfer. The applicant has neither returned the money nor purchased a house for her. Thus, the applicant is alleged to have committed the offence alleged.

4. I have heard Sri.K.M. Jamaludheen, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A. Noushad, the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6. The law regarding the grant or refusal of pre- arrest bail is well settled. Pre-arrest bail cannot be granted as a matter of course. The power underSection 482ofBNSScould be exercised only when a special case is made out, that too, recording reasons thereof. Perusal of the case diary reveals that the accusation made against the applicant is very serious in nature, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on his part. The case records would show that Rs. 7,00,000/- has been transferred to the account of the applicant. There is nothing on record to show that it has been repaid. The applicant also has criminal antecedents.

7. The investigation is in a preliminary stage. The custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary for the investigation. As rightly argued by the learned Public Prosecutor, the possibility of the applicant influencing the witnesses and interfering with the investigation cannot be ruled out if he is released on bail. Considering the gravity of the offence and stage of the investigation, I am of the view that this is not a fit case where the extraordinary jurisdiction vested with this Court under Section 482 of BNSS could be invoked. The bail application is, accordingly, dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top