Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SHIBILI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pre-arrest bail application based on statutory provisions. (Para 2) |
| 2. court’s consideration of the applicant's status in the case. (Para 3) |
O R D E R
This application is filed underSection 482of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking pre- arrest bail.
2. The applicant is accused No.2 in Crime No.1095/2025 of Kondotty Police Station, Malappuram District. The offences alleged are punishable underSections 115(2), 316(2) and 318(4) of theBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. I have heard Sri.P.C.Muhammed Noushiq, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the applicant has been deleted from the array of the accused. The said submission is recorded and the bail application is closed.
Sd/- d/S-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
