Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9538

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MUHAMMED ISMAYIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14070 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.1292/2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.HAMEED SHABLAN, SHRI.SHIBU V.M., SMT.GOPIKA K.V., SMT.AISWARYA K.S., SMT.SHERIN ANWAR
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI

Court permits withdrawal of bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Headnote:This case concerns the withdrawal of a bail application under BAIL APPL. NO. 14070 OF 2025, concerning CRIME NO.1292/2025. The court found the application for bail submitted by the accused was not necessary anymore, permitting the withdrawal. The decision to withdraw followed the defense counsel's request on the hearing date. The court dismissed the bail application as withdrawn, marking the conclusion of this aspect of the proceedings.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw this bail application.

The permission sought for is granted. Hence, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9538

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JMUHAMMED ISMAYIL – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentBAIL APPL. NO. 14070 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.1292/2025

Court permits withdrawal of bail application, dismissing it as withdrawn.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MUHAMMED ISMAYIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 14070 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.1292/2025