SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9539

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MUHAMMED ASHRAF – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU, SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH, SMT.ARYA RAGHUNATH, SHRI.KARUKAPADATH WAZIM BABU, SMT.P.LAKSHMI, SMT.AYSHA E.M., SHRI.HASHIM K.M., SHRI.ABUASIL A.K., SMT.HANIYA NAFIZA V.S., SHRI.M.I.INSAF MOOPPAN, SHRI.RISHI VINCENT, SHRI.MANU KRISHNA S.K.
For the Respondents: SRI.K.A. NOUSHAD

ORDER

This application is filed by the applicants under Section

482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 seeking pre- arrest bail apprehending arrest in a crime involving non bailable offence registered at Pavaratty Police Station, Thrissur District.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicants as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.

The learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that no crime has been registered against the applicants at the Pavaratty Police Station. The above submission is recorded and the anticipatory bail application is dismissed.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JUDGE

mea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top