SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9544

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KRISHNENDHU T.C, MADHAV A.K – Appellant
Versus
MEDICAL COUNSELLING COMMITTEE (MCC) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46736 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL, SHRI.SIVASANKAR
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA, SRI.P.M.SANEER, SRI.AKHIL ISSAC LEESON, SRI.P.G.PRAMOD, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The dismissal of a writ petition is appropriate when the matter becomes infructuous, signifying no substantive legal question remains.

Headnote:The petitioners challenge the decision of the Medical Counselling Committee regarding admission processes under the relevant health laws. The court finds the matter has become infructuous, thus dismissing the petition without delving into substantive issues. The finality rests in the dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon