KRISHNENDHU T.C, MADHAV A.K vs MEDICAL COUNSELLING COMMITTEE (MCC)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9544

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KRISHNENDHU T.C, MADHAV A.K – Appellant
Versus
MEDICAL COUNSELLING COMMITTEE (MCC) – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL, SHRI.SIVASANKAR
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA, SRI.P.M.SANEER, SRI.AKHIL ISSAC LEESON, SRI.P.G.PRAMOD, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9544

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JKRISHNENDHU T.C, MADHAV A.K – AppellantVersusMEDICAL COUNSELLING COMMITTEE (MCC) – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KRISHNENDHU T.C, MADHAV A.K – Appellant
Versus
MEDICAL COUNSELLING COMMITTEE (MCC) – Respondent