SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9545

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
Raghunathan G., Thara T. – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.H.VISHNUDAS
For the Respondents: K.ANAND

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, pursuant to the interim payment made by the petitioners, the loan is regularized.

In the circumstances, the Writ Petition is not pressed. Petitioners seek liberty to approach this Court, if necessity arises in future. Liberty granted. The Writ Petition will stand dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top