SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9547

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
HANEEFA P.P. – Appellant
Versus
1 SHO, VALAPATTANAM POLICE STATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4356 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.K.SUBHASH, SMT.JENI JOHN
For the Respondents: SRI.AJITH VISWANATHAN, GP.

Scooter seizure under Section 23 of the Kerala Act deemed inappropriate as per its provisions.

Headnote:The petitioner against the seizure of a Scooter alleges that it falls outside the scope of Section 23 of the Kerala Act concerning river bank regulations. The court finds that the allegations do not substantiate a seizure under the Act. The central issue discussed relates to the legality of the seizure based on the interpretation of Section 23. The court's reasoning establishes that the Scooter was not used for illegal sand transportation under the Act. The final outcome results in the direction for the immediate release of the Scooter.

Table of Content
1. petitioner challenges seizure of scooter. (Para 1 , 2)
2. scooter not subject to section 23 seizure. (Para 4)
3. court orders immediate release of scooter. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by the seizure of a Scooter under Section 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 . Learned counsel would submit that a Scooter will not come within the purview of , only on an allegation that instructions were given by the 2nd accused, sitting in the Scooter.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this Court finds substance in the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. A perusal of Ext.P1 F.I.R would indicate the facts as follows:-

On 26/3/2025, at 03.15 hours, a tipper lorry bearing No. KL 13 AT 5607 was found parked in the banks of the river, and a person was found sitting in a Scooter giving instructions. The lorry was parked for transportation of sand without any authorizing document, is the allegation levelled. The offence alleged is under Section 305(e) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and also, under Section 20 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 . 3. It could be seen that the solitary allegation pertaining to the use of Scooter is that, instructions have been given by the 2nd accused to the 1st accused for illegal transportation of sand, sitting in the Scooter. Section 23 contemplates the seizure of a vehicle or other article “used or intended to be used for the removal of sand from any kadavu or transportation thereof without complying the provisions of the Act”.

4. Having regard to the attendant facts, the Scooter, as also, the way in which it is alleged to have been used, cannot attract the requirements of Section 23 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001 .

5. In the circumstances, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to release the Scooter of the petitioner, after verifying the records. This direction shall be complied forthwith, upon production of a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent.

This Writ Petition will stand allowed as indicated above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top