SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9551

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
P. ABDUL SALAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SANTHOSH PETER, SHRI.NADEEM NAZAR, SRI.M.S.SANDEEP SUDHAKARAN, SHRI.MUHAMMED SUHAIL V., SMT.FATHIMA HIBA K. P.
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

ORDER

Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026 The sole accused in C.C.No.484/2024 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kolencherry, arising out of Crime No.366/2023 of Kunnathunadu police station, filed this Crl.M.C. under Section 528 of BNSS, praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 354 , 354A(1)(i) of IPC .

2. The prosecution case is that the accused with the intention to outrage the modesty of the defacto complainant on 17.05.2023 at about 4.35 p.m., at the premises of Wonderla Holidays Ltd., grabbed the buttocks of the defacto complainant and thereby outraged her modesty.

3. When this matter was taken up for hearing on admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought for permission to withdraw this Crl.M.C. with liberty to raise all contentions before the trial court. Permission granted. This Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise all contentions before the trial court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top