Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
EGLAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 9401 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ANEESH K.R, SHRI.JOSEPH BEN, SMT.ANJANA P., SMT.AISWARYA.A
For the Respondents: Smt. C.Seena

A criminal miscellaneous case can be dismissed as infructuous when the appellant indicates that proceedings are no longer relevant.

Headnote:This judgment concerns Crl.M.C No. 9401 of 2025. The petitioners contend that the matter is infructuous, which has led the court to dismiss the petition. The issue framed was whether the case remains relevant to proceed with. The court ruled that as the petition is no longer pertinent, it is dismissed as infructuous.

ORDER

Dated this the 12^th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Crl.M.C has become infructuous and hence it can be dismissed.

In the light of the above submission, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JUDGE NJ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9555

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JEGLAY – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 9401 OF 2025

A criminal miscellaneous case can be dismissed as infructuous when the appellant indicates that proceedings are no longer relevant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
EGLAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 9401 OF 2025