Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
.......... .......... .......... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial case facts and marital resolution. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court's considerations on ongoing impact and legal reasoning. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. integration of marriage into legal proceedings and implications. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final resolution and allowance of the quashing petition. (Para 10) |
ORDER
Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026 The petitioner who is the sole accused in S.C.No.934/2025 on the file of the Fast Track Special Court, Perumbavoor, arising out of Crime No.605/2025 of Perumbavoor police station, filed this Crl.M.C. under Section 528 of BNSS, praying for quashing all further proceedings against him. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 354 , 376 of IPC, Sections 6 4 (2)(m) of BNS and Sections 6 r/w 5j (ii), 5 m of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (PoCSO Act, in short)
2. The prosecution case is that the accused with the intention to satisfy his sexual lust between 13.04.2024 and 01.09.2024 on several days committed penetrative sexual assault upon the defacto complainant and impregnanted her.
3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, now the entire dispute between the petitioner and the d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
