SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9557

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
BABU T.P – Appellant
Versus
1 BANK OF BARODA, 2 STATE OF KERALA, 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SHAHIM BIN AZIZ, SHRI.MOHAMMED SHAFI.K, SHRI.RAFEEK. V.K, SMT.O.A.NURIYA, SMT.NISHNA P.T, SMT.LYDIA ELIZABETH KOVOOR, SMT.ANNLIYA FLEMIN, SMT.MUFEEDHA P., SHRI.ABDUL RAHOOF P.M.
For the Respondents: SHRI.BEPIN VIJAYAN, SMT.KAVITHA.S, SMT.VYSHNA K., SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK, SR.PP

ORDER

Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for sometime, seeks liberty to withdraw this Criminal Miscellaneous Case, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the Trial Court, including filing an application for discharge, provided charge has not been framed till date.

Recording the above submission, and by reserving the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the Trial Court, including filing an application for discharge, provided charge has not been framed, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top