SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9573

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
PRANAV B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 8706 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.MADHU, SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI
For the Respondents: SHRI.THOMAS JOHN P.

Withdrawal of a petition does not preclude the petitioners' rights to pursue their arguments in the trial court.

Headnote:The petitioners, through their learned counsel, sought to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous case without prejudice to their rights in the Trial Court. The Court dismissed the case as withdrawn, ensuring the petitioners could still present their arguments at trial.

O R D E R Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioners seek liberty to withdraw the Crl.M.C, without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to raise all their contentions before the Trial Court.

Recording the above submission, the Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to raise all their contentions before the Trial Court.

SD/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top