IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
APARNA.L – Appellant
Versus
K.A.ANOOP ARAVIND – Respondent
Devan Ramachandran, J.
The petitioner seeks that Exts.P2, P6 and P7 be directed to be taken up by the learned Family Court and disposed of, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2. We called for a report from the learned Family Court on the status of the afore applications, and the same is now available with us, which reads as follows:
“In obedience to the directions contained in the O.M. under reference, I humbly submit the following for kind perusal.
It is humbly submitted that O.P. No.765/2024 is for recovery of gold and money.
Ext.P2 ie; IA 1/2024 is an attachment petition. Notice was issued, and the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have entered their appearance and filed their objection.
Ext.P6 ie, IA 8/2025 is for impleading additional respondent 4 and 5. Notice was ordered, but no steps were taken.
Ext.P7 ie; 1A 9/2025 is for restraining the respondent Nos. 4 and 5 from paying amounts to the original 'respondent. Notice was ordered in IA 8/2025 for respondent Nos. 4 and 5, but steps not taken till date. IA 9/2025 can only be considered after the appearance of the respondent Nos. 4 and 5.
Thus the report is submitted for kind consideration.”
3. It is thus obvious that this Court cannot
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.