Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9579

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
MANJU SATHYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 19594 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF, SRI.M.H.ASIF ALI, SMT.SWETHAMBILY C., SMT.RAJANA JOSE
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.MANOJKUMAR, SHRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ, KUM.THULASI K. RAJ, SMT.APARNA NARAYAN MENON, SMT.CHINNU MARIA ANTONY, SMT.SYLAJA S.L.

The court identified and ruled on the infructuous nature of the petition leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:In the case WP

(C) No. 19594 of 2023, the petitioner contended the matter was infructuous; therefore, the court identified the issue and noted the parties’ submissions. The court ruled that the matter was, indeed, infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. The petition was dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9579

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JMANJU SATHYAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 19594 OF 2023

The court identified and ruled on the infructuous nature of the petition leading to its dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
MANJU SATHYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 19594 OF 2023