SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9581

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
GOPALAKRISHNAN.K.V. – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41474 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.P.PRADEEP, SMT.MINIKUMARY M.V., SRI.P.K.SATHEES KUMAR, SRI.R.K.PRASANTH, SHRI.JIJO JOSEPH
For the Respondents: ADV.SRI.R.GIREESH VARMA, SMT.SYLAJA S.L., GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Withdrawal of writ petition leads to dismissal when not pressed by the petitioner.

Headnote:In relation to WP

(C) No. 41474 of 2023 before IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM, it has been established that the petitioner voluntarily withdrew their application, as indicated by both counsel's submissions. The court subsequently ruled on the writ petition, effectively dismissing it without further proceedings. The issue presented was the withdrawal of the petition with the court's acknowledgment. The court found that the petitioner presented no further arguments, leading to a dismissal as not pressed.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is not pressed.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top