SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9586

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
ANANTHA KRISHNA R.R – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 1717 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ALEX K.JOHN, SHRI.ABHISHEK T.M., SMT.FIDA HUSNA P.P.
For the Respondents: ADV E C BINEESH PP

The court may grant permission to withdraw a writ petition at the discretion of the petitioner without adverse implications.

Headnote:The judgment revolves around the permission sought by the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition (Crl). The relevant statute permits withdrawal under specific conditions. The court granted the request, thereby determining that the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The primary issue was whether the withdrawal was permissible. The court reasoned that permission to withdraw is within the discretion of the court, and since no adverse effects ensue from this withdrawal, the petition is dismissed. The ruling concludes that the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petiion. Permission as sought for is granted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top