Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PALLAVI V., G. NARAYANASWAMY – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, P. GANGADHARAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek cancellation of permit due to document failure. (Para 1) |
| 2. court relies on previous judgments regarding permit decisions. (Para 2) |
| 3. order to process applications as per earlier rulings. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
[WP(C) Nos.3386/2026, 3482/2026]
These writ petitions are filed with the following prayers:
“1.Declare that the regular permit granted to the 3rd Respondent by Exhibit P3 decision of the RTA stands cancelled/revoked by operation of R.159(2) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules , 1989 on account of the failure on the part of the 3rd Respondent to produce the current records of a suitable stage carriage within the maximum time allowed by the RTA by Exhibit P4 decision.
2.Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or such other writ, order or direction interdicting the 2nd Respondent from issuing the regular permit granted by Exhibit P3 decision of the RTA on account of the failure on the part of the 3rd Respondent to produce the current records of a suitable stage carriage within the maximum time allowed by the RTA by Exhibit P4 decision.
3.Dispense with the English translation of the vernacular Exhibit until such time as otherwise ordered by this Honorable
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
