SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9597

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
SUNNY K.T. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8102 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.C. Thomas Adhikaram, P. Fazil, Jayasree Manoj, Parvathi Venugopal, Saju Thaliath, V.S. Sreejith
For the Respondents: Shibu Joseph, Sunil N. Shenoi, K.S. Arun Kumar, P. Viswanathan (Sr.)

A petitioner can voluntarily withdraw their writ petition leading to its dismissal without further inquiry.

Headnote:The writ petition is based on relevant statutes governing civil rights and local governance. The petitioner sought relief concerning property disputes and objections raised to certain earlier governmental orders. The court observed the petitioner's withdrawal from the proceedings, thereby concluding the matter without further adjudication. The issues revolved around the admissibility of the writ petition and procedural inquiries. The petitioner was observed to have voluntarily chosen to withdraw, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed.

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue this writ petition. In the light of the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top