SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9597

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
SUNNY K.T. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.C. Thomas Adhikaram, P. Fazil, Jayasree Manoj, Parvathi Venugopal, Saju Thaliath, V.S. Sreejith
For the Respondents: Shibu Joseph, Sunil N. Shenoi, K.S. Arun Kumar, P. Viswanathan (Sr.)

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to pursue this writ petition. In the light of the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top