IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BENNY – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“I. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the respondents topass order on Exhibit P4 expeditiously with in a time frame.
II. To dispense with filing of the translation of Vernacular Documents.
III. Allow the Writ petition with costs.
IV. Grant such other further reliefs which this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 Form–5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P4 Form-5 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Ext.P4 Form-5 application to the 1st respondent / Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.