Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BENNY – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks timely relief related to form-5 application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hears counsel and summarizes the request. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs authorities regarding timely actions. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“I. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the respondents topass order on Exhibit P4 expeditiously with in a time frame.
II. To dispense with filing of the translation of Vernacular Documents.
III. Allow the Writ petition with costs.
IV. Grant such other further reliefs which this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 Form–5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P4 Form-5 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
