SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9603

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BENNY AGED 62 YEARS, S/O VARGHESE – Appellant
Versus
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5513 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.MANAVI MURALEEDHARAN, SMT.ANJANA K.P.
For the Respondents: SR GP, SMT VIDYA KURAIKOSE

Court granted directions for timely processing of Form-5 application as per statutory requirements.

Headnote:The present case arose under WP

(C) No. 5513 of 2026 where the petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider Ext.P4 Form-5 application expeditiously. The court found the request reasonable and granted directions to ensure timely action on the application. The court ordered specific timelines for the report submission and consideration of the application by the respondents.

Table of Content
1. petitioner filed for relief via writ for application processing. (Para 1)
2. counsel's assertion to expedite consideration noted. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court found merit in expeditious processing. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“I. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing the respondnets to consider and pass order on Exhibit P4 expeditiously within a time frame.

II. To dispense with filing of the translation of Vernacular Documents.

III. Allow the Writ petition with costs.

IV. Grant such other further reliefs which tis Hon’ble Court may be pleased to direct in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 Form–5 application within a time frame.

3. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P4 Form-5 application within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 4th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Ext.P4 Form-5 application to the 1st respondent / Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent / Authorised O directed to consider Ext.P4 Form-5 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1st and 4th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE nvj

Judgment reserved NA
Date of judgment 12.02.2026
Judgment dictated 12.02.2026
Draft Judgment Placed 12.02.2026
Final Judgment Uploaded 13.02.2026
APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 5513 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top