SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9604

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
CHANDY – Appellant
Versus
CHIKKU – Respondent
MAT.APPEAL NO.166 OF 2016|OP NO.339 OF 2014



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.K.MURALEEDHARAN, SUNU P.JOHN
For the Respondents: LJI.J.VADAKEDOM

The court dismissed the matrimonial appeal for lack of pressing merits.

Headnote:The court analyzed the matter under the provisions of the Family Courts Act, emphasizing the relevancy of the facts surrounding the matrimonial appeal. The facts included the submission regarding the non-pressing of the appeal by the appellants. The court found that the appeal lacked merit leading to its dismissal as not pressed. The primary issue was whether the appeal presented sufficient grounds to proceed, leading to the court's determination to dismiss the matter without further proceedings. The final verdict is that the matrimonial appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sathish Ninan, &

P.Krishna Kumar, JJ.

==============================

Mat.Appeal No.166 of 2016 =======================================

Dated this the 12th day of February, 2026

JUDGMENT

Sathish Ninan, J.

Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants, the Matrimonial Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top