SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9605

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
MICHEAL PUTHENTHARA – Appellant
Versus
CHRISTA GEORGE (PRESHKA) – Respondent
RFA NO.344 OF 2018|OS NO.8 OF 2016



Mediation settlements can be judicially recognized even if not all parties are signatories.

Headnote:In this RFA concerning OS NO.8 OF 2016, the parties reached a mediated settlement. The court, noting the mediation outcome, dispensed with the signature of the third respondent not a party to the settlement. Thus, the memorandum of settlement is accepted, confirming the appeal's disposal as per the agreement.

Sathish Ninan, J.

The parties have settled their disputes in mediation. Though the 3rd respondent who is required to contest the suit, is not a party to the compromise, in the light of the statements contained in paragraph 3 of the memorandum of settlement, the signature is dispensed with.

The memorandum of settlement is accepted and the appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement. The memorandum of agreement will form part of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top