Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9609

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
CRENZA.COMMANDER VITRIFIED PVT.LTD – Appellant
Versus
JANNATHUL FIRDHOUSE VAZHAYIL HOUSE PONNAD – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1012 OF 2025 | CC NO.134 OF 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR, SRI.SUNIL J.CHAKKALACKAL, SMT.SREELAKSHMI J PILLAI, SMT.N.G.SINDHU
For the Respondents: SHRI.T.A MOHAMED SAGEER, SHRI.ANOOP ELIAS, SMT.NEENU VIMALKUMAR, SMT.SREELAKSHMI G., SMT.SAJEENA ABDU T.K.

A party may withdraw its appeal, leading to dismissal of proceedings upon request.

Headnote:The petitioner sought to dismiss the matter, with the court acknowledging this intent. The case centers on a consumer complaint wherein the petitioner expressed no further interest in prosecution. The court effectively terminates proceedings, recognizing the petitioner's decision not to proceed.

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not intending to prosecute the matter any further.

The original petition is hence dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9609

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R.RAVI, JCRENZA.COMMANDER VITRIFIED PVT.LTD – AppellantVersusJANNATHUL FIRDHOUSE VAZHAYIL HOUSE PONNAD – RespondentOP(C) NO. 1012 OF 2025 | CC NO.134 OF 2024

A party may withdraw its appeal, leading to dismissal of proceedings upon request.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
CRENZA.COMMANDER VITRIFIED PVT.LTD – Appellant
Versus
JANNATHUL FIRDHOUSE VAZHAYIL HOUSE PONNAD – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1012 OF 2025 | CC NO.134 OF 2024