SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9611

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
SHEIK ABDUL KHADER RAWTHER – Appellant
Versus
UNNIKRISHNAN – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN, SHRI.WINSTON K.V, SMT.ANU JACOB
For the Respondents: SHRI.K.N.ABHILASH, SHRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT, SHRI.RITHIK S.ANAND, SMT.ANU PAUL, SMT.SREELAKSHMI MENON, SHRI.T.R.ANIL VENUGOPAL

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not intending to prosecute the matter any further.

The original petition is hence dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

T.R. RAVI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top