Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9611

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
SHEIK ABDUL KHADER RAWTHER – Appellant
Versus
UNNIKRISHNAN – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2354 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN, SHRI.WINSTON K.V, SMT.ANU JACOB
For the Respondents: SHRI.K.N.ABHILASH, SHRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT, SHRI.RITHIK S.ANAND, SMT.ANU PAUL, SMT.SREELAKSHMI MENON, SHRI.T.R.ANIL VENUGOPAL

Petitioner may withdraw civil appeals at their discretion if no intention to proceed is expressed.

Headnote:This judgment relates to OP

(C) No. 2354 of 2022. The petitioner stated an intention not to proceed with the matter further, leading to the dismissal of the original petition. The Court noted the petitioner's submission and accordingly dismissed the petition as not pressed. The judgment reflects a clear adherence to procedural norms in civil matters regarding the withdrawal of appeals.

JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not intending to prosecute the matter any further.

The original petition is hence dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

T.R. RAVI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9611

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R.RAVI, JSHEIK ABDUL KHADER RAWTHER – AppellantVersusUNNIKRISHNAN – RespondentOP(C) NO. 2354 OF 2022

Petitioner may withdraw civil appeals at their discretion if no intention to proceed is expressed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
SHEIK ABDUL KHADER RAWTHER – Appellant
Versus
UNNIKRISHNAN – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 2354 OF 2022