Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9614

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
KAMALAMMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 14752 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.HALVI K.S.
For the Respondents: DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.), SRI.R.AZAD BABU, SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR, SRI.S.K.ADHITHYAN, SRI.SABU PULLAN, SRI.GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN, SRI.P.MOHANDAS

Non-prosecution due to absence of petitioners results in dismissal of the writ petition.

Headnote:The case involved a writ petition filed by petitioners challenging certain decisions made concerning land acquisition and transportation laws. The court noted the absence of the petitioners during the hearings on 11.02.2026 and on the judgment date. Consequently, the court determined to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution.

Result: The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 12^th day of February, 2026 When the matter came up for consideration on 11.02.2026, there is no representation for the petitioners. Even today there is no appearance on their behalf.

Accordingly, the above writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9614

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JKAMALAMMA – AppellantVersusUNION OF INDIA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 14752 OF 2021

Non-prosecution due to absence of petitioners results in dismissal of the writ petition.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
KAMALAMMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 14752 OF 2021