Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9615

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SMART ASSOCIATES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 25026 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.N.K.SUBRAMANIAN, SHRI.ABRAHAM MATHAN, SHRI.ATHUL TOM, SHRI.SUBRAM N.S.
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.VINAY MATHEW JOSEPH GP- RIYAL DEVASSY

The Court upheld the procedural right of the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

Headnote:The High Court analyzed the withdrawal of the writ petition filed under WP

(C) No. 25026 of 2022. The petitioner sought to withdraw their challenge regarding the state’s actions. The Court accepted the memo for withdrawal and dismissed the petition. The core issue framed was about the procedural validity of the withdrawal. The judgment concludes with the decision that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 12^th day of February, 2026 A memo has been filed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the case.

Memo accepted. Accordingly, the above writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9615

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JSMART ASSOCIATES – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 25026 OF 2022

The Court upheld the procedural right of the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SMART ASSOCIATES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 25026 OF 2022