SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 9620

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Soumen Sen, CJ, Syam Kumar V.M., J
MOHANAN T R – Appellant
Versus
SHRI AJITH K RAMAN, SMT MEGHASHREE D R – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ARUN THOMAS, SHRI.SHINTO MATHEW ABRAHAM, SHRI.ANIL SEBASTIAN PULICKEL, SHRI.MATHEW NEVIN THOMAS, SHRI.KURIAN ANTONY MATHEW, SMT.KARTHIKA MARIA, SMT.LEAH RACHEL NINAN, SHRI.KARTHIK RAJAGOPAL, SMT.APARNNA S., SHRI.NOEL NINAN NINAN, SMT.VEENA RAVEENDRAN, SHRI.ADEEN NAZAR
For the Respondents: ASOK M.CHERIAN, SHRI.T.S.SHYAM PRASANTH

Soumen Sen, C. J.

This Contempt Case is disposed of by directing Forest Department to ascertain and find out whether the petitioner was granted permission for ecotourism in Kuruva island as it appears from the order dated 25.09.2024. The permission for ecotourism shall be restricted to Forest Department.

In the event it is found that the petitioner was permitted for ecotourism by the Forest Department, we intend to mention that in terms of the order dated 25.09.2024, he acquires the right to operate.

Sd/-

Soumen Sen Chief Justice Sd/-

Syam Kumar V.M.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top